<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Nightline</title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://rarepattern.com/tags/nightline"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://rarepattern.com/taxonomy/term/231/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://rarepattern.com/taxonomy/term/231/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2007-10-04T13:03:35-05:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Interview ironies: 60 Minutes/Nightline &quot;puff&quot; vs. Daily Show hardball</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://rarepattern.com/nodes/2007/10/interview-ironies-60-minutes-nightline-puff-vs-daily-show-hardball" />
    <id>http://rarepattern.com/nodes/2007/10/interview-ironies-60-minutes-nightline-puff-vs-daily-show-hardball</id>
    <published>2007-10-04T13:02:28-05:00</published>
    <updated>2007-10-04T13:03:35-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Laura Scott</name>
    </author>
    <category term="60 Minutes" />
    <category term="books" />
    <category term="Chris Matthews" />
    <category term="Clarence Thomas" />
    <category term="Jon Stewart" />
    <category term="Nightline" />
    <category term="television" />
    <category term="The Daily Show" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Via <a href="http://www.poynter.org/column.asp?id=45&amp;aid=130901">Romanesko</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.maynardije.org/columns/dickprince/071003_prince/"></a></p>
<h3>CBS, ABC Deny Airing "Puff" on Thomas</h3>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p>CBS-TV and ABC-TV defended their networks' pieces on Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas amid  criticism that "60 Minutes" and "Nightline" had offered up uncritical "puff pieces" as they  interviewed Thomas in connection with his new memoir, "My Grandfather's Son."</p>
<p>...As noted Monday, the reviews were different on the e-mail list of the National Association of  Black Journalists, and in a discussion of the "60 Minutes" piece on PBS' "The Tavis Smiley Show." </p>
<p>"I've now watched the 60 Minutes interview and the Nightline interview. It was like watching the Home Shopping Network," wrote one. "You mean to  tell me that there was not a single critical commentator on Clarence Thomas' record? These things could have been on Larry King and no one would have blinked. I'm rarely disgusted, but this was pure journalistic drivel."</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Meanwhile, the man who does the real fake journalism, Jon Stewart, seems to demonstrate a bit more journalistic integrity, albeit in his own comic style, than is <i>de rigeur</i> for the mainstream media book promotion routine:</p>
<p><embed flashvars="videoId=104548" src='http://www.comedycentral.com/sitewide/video_player/view/default/swf.jhtml' quality='high' bgcolor='#cccccc' width='332' height='316' name='comedy_central_player' align='middle' allowscriptaccess='always' allownetworking='external' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' pluginspage='http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer'></embed></p>
<p>Oh the irony!</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Via <a href="http://www.poynter.org/column.asp?id=45&amp;aid=130901">Romanesko</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.maynardije.org/columns/dickprince/071003_prince/"><br />
<h3>CBS, ABC Deny Airing "Puff" on Thomas</h3>
<p></p></a></p>
<p>CBS-TV and ABC-TV defended their networks' pieces on Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas amid  criticism that "60 Minutes" and "Nightline" had offered up uncritical "puff pieces" as they  interviewed Thomas in connection with his new memoir, "My Grandfather's Son."</p>
<p>...As noted Monday, the reviews were different on the e-mail list of the National Association of  Black Journalists, and in a discussion of the "60 Minutes" piece on PBS' "The Tavis Smiley Show." </p>
<p>"I've now watched the 60 Minutes interview and the Nightline interview. It was like watching the Home Shopping Network," wrote one. "You mean to  tell me that there was not a single critical commentator on Clarence Thomas' record? These things could have been on Larry King and no one would have blinked. I'm rarely disgusted, but this was pure journalistic drivel."</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Meanwhile, the man who does the real fake journalism, Jon Stewart, seems to demonstrate a bit more journalistic integrity, albeit in his own comic style, than is <i>de rigeur</i> for the mainstream media book promotion routine:</p>
<p><embed flashvars="videoId=104548" src='http://www.comedycentral.com/sitewide/video_player/view/default/swf.jhtml' quality='high' bgcolor='#cccccc' width='332' height='316' name='comedy_central_player' align='middle' allowscriptaccess='always' allownetworking='external' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' pluginspage='http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer'></embed></p>
<p>Oh the irony!</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
