<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Joost</title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://rarepattern.com/tags/joost"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://rarepattern.com/taxonomy/term/164/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://rarepattern.com/taxonomy/term/164/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2007-04-05T23:10:34-05:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Joost as good as the content it has</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://rarepattern.com/nodes/2007/04/joost-as-good-as-the-content-it-has" />
    <id>http://rarepattern.com/nodes/2007/04/joost-as-good-as-the-content-it-has</id>
    <published>2007-04-05T23:09:31-05:00</published>
    <updated>2007-04-05T23:10:34-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Laura Scott</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Comcast" />
    <category term="convergence" />
    <category term="GUI" />
    <category term="HDTV" />
    <category term="interactive design" />
    <category term="internet" />
    <category term="Joost" />
    <category term="television" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.joost.com/" title="Joost&amp;trade;"><img src="http://banners.joost.com/joost_002_en_120x240.jpg" alt="Joost&amp;trade;" class="wrapr" /></a>I suppose I should feel like the cool insider for being a Joost beta tester. All I did was fill out a form some time ago.</p>
<p>Joost has a pretty logo, and their website is full of Flashy color. However, the actual Joost application experience is much more monochrome.</p>
<p>I find the GUI a bit clunky, but that's to be expected in beta. It's better than the ridiculously bad Comcast digital cable UI, a little. Personally I found the placement of navigation buttons to be awkward.</p>
<p>I spent only 15 minutes or so in my first try of Joost.  Most of the time I was trying to scroll through channels to find something that actually interested me. This is where the navigation proved a bit challenging. I think my experience was hampered by the fact that I was trying it out at peak hours -- prime time. Maybe in the morning it would be better.</p>
<p>My first impression was that there wasn't all that much on Joost. I can spend hours surfing through what, 500 channels of television on Comcast, and find nothing on. Same with Joost, I fear. In the end, Joost can be only as good as the content it presents. </p>
<p>The low resolution of video is to be expected. You're not going to get high-quality video through the puny ISP bandwidths available today in the US. That puts an imperative on Joost to offer something different, something somehow better -- or at least <i>other</i> -- than what we find on the three-digit cable channels. </p>
<p>Maybe I'm the wrong customer because I'm watching TV on a 42" plasma HDTV. (Hey, it was a deal and it was cheaper than the smaller LCD.) I look at upconverted DVDs and HDTV programs and see something new: details. High resolution is nice.</p>
<p>I'll try Joost again and perhaps share some more thoughts. I hate to leave this post on such a down note, so I'll give it another shot. I want it to be <i>great</i>. I'll settle for okay.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.joost.com/" title="Joost&amp;trade;"><img src="http://banners.joost.com/joost_002_en_120x240.jpg" alt="Joost&amp;trade;" class="wrapr" /></a>I suppose I should feel like the cool insider for being a Joost beta tester. All I did was fill out a form some time ago.</p>
<p>Joost has a pretty logo, and their website is full of Flashy color. However, the actual Joost application experience is much more monochrome.</p>
<p>I find the GUI a bit clunky, but that's to be expected in beta. It's better than the ridiculously bad Comcast digital cable UI, a little. Personally I found the placement of navigation buttons to be awkward.</p>
<p>I spent only 15 minutes or so in my first try of Joost.  Most of the time I was trying to scroll through channels to find something that actually interested me. This is where the navigation proved a bit challenging. I think my experience was hampered by the fact that I was trying it out at peak hours -- prime time. Maybe in the morning it would be better.</p>
<p>My first impression was that there wasn't all that much on Joost. I can spend hours surfing through what, 500 channels of television on Comcast, and find nothing on. Same with Joost, I fear. In the end, Joost can be only as good as the content it presents. </p>
<p>The low resolution of video is to be expected. You're not going to get high-quality video through the puny ISP bandwidths available today in the US. That puts an imperative on Joost to offer something different, something somehow better -- or at least <i>other</i> -- than what we find on the three-digit cable channels. </p>
<p>Maybe I'm the wrong customer because I'm watching TV on a 42" plasma HDTV. (Hey, it was a deal and it was cheaper than the smaller LCD.) I look at upconverted DVDs and HDTV programs and see something new: details. High resolution is nice.</p>
<p>I'll try Joost again and perhaps share some more thoughts. I hate to leave this post on such a down note, so I'll give it another shot. I want it to be <i>great</i>. I'll settle for okay.</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
