This is truly astonishing
Site content ©2005-8 Laura Scott. "Fair use" is encouraged.
User login
Syndicate
Recent comments
- Can I come sit in your office
6 days 14 hours ago - How much did that cost? We
2 weeks 45 min ago - I never really "got it" with
2 weeks 47 min ago - Can't get enough!
3 weeks 10 hours ago - Classic! I loved this -- and
6 weeks 6 hours ago - Much appreciated! We may be
9 weeks 13 hours ago - Thanks, Virginia!
9 weeks 13 hours ago - Yeehaw! Looks very nice.
9 weeks 14 hours ago - Hey! Nice graphics! Thank
9 weeks 1 day ago - Cool. Please let me know
10 weeks 6 days ago
Popular content
Today's:
All time:
- Sony temporarily halts use of crippleware, but Homeland Security still is not pleased
- CSS-only design
- 13 Going on 30 Redux; or: Happy Girls Don't Do Careers
- Dotslash Drupal theme
- Who'd have thought we'd be here right now?
- Beware that stomach flu
- Marilyn Monroe is now in public domain
- Battlestar Galactica back in space
- Is that spyware on your blog? (Or are you just glad to see me?)
- Sometimes a little redesign is necessary
Laura says elsewhere
- lauras: I suppose if you think things are hunky dory, none of that would touch you.
- lauras: At least there are no cynics on Twitter. Right? Right?
- lauras: You know, using attachment signatures in email is just plain rude. *sigh*
- lauras: @CharlesMcKeever 1 idea: CCK w attachment, fields for indexing; Views for browsing, sorting; Views fast search for search of files
- lauras: Blogged re Hug a developer today http://twurl.nl/6kylbw
Comments
This is a hoax, why are you
This is a hoax, why are you posting links to it?
Do you honestly believe this will actually happen, without people just simply going to a 'net neutral' ISP?
Most people are mainstream buyers
Sure, you could go to a neutral ISP, as you say. But really, how many others will?
I'm curious why you call it a hoax. Congress is deciding on this. The communications conglomerates are lobbying heavily on this. Why are you so eager to dismiss?